A New Verizon - Embracing Prepaid with a Tracfone Acquisition

Verizon announced its intention to acquire America Movil's US Tracfone property which includes not only the Tracfone brand but also nine other prepaid brands.  The Tracfone property brings ~21M subscribers, 90K distribution doors and 850 employees.  

The transaction will include $3.125 billion in cash and $3.125 billion in Verizon common stock and also includes up to an additional $650 million in future cash consideration related to the achievement of certain performance measures and other commercial arrangements.  Expected deal close is 2H21.

Why It Matters

The old Verizon of old is gone in which it eschewed or minimized its prepaid operations for the chase of higher ARPU bearing postpaid users.  Surprisingly after 10 quarters of net prepaid losses, 2Q20 showed a positive net adds. 

As of 2Q20, prepaid only accounted for ~4M users (~4%) of the ~94M retail base. Tracfone by far has been the largest prepaid player and (if closed by 2H21), Verizon will be the largest prepaid player with ~25M subs. As of 2Q20, competitors' prepaid bases:

• AT&T (~18M)  
• T-Mobile (~11+M) 
• DISH (~9M)   

Moreover, the Tracfone unit reported >$8B in revenue which helps to provide a purely wireless growth story even when the other strategic bets didn't pan out (e.g., Yahoo/AOL, Oath, Terremark, etc). But Verizon could be in the driver's seat as Tracfone's America Movil parent has been absorbing years of net losses with the only bright spot in 2Q20 in which the unit beat out its competitors in net adds with 214K.

Looking Ahead

Verizon could work the new acquisition in ARPU to drive greater revenue as Tracfone's ARPU has been steadily increasing to $28 partly due to the strength of Straight Talk. There is room to grow with peers' prepaid ARPU in the mid to high $30s.  Going forward, it remains to be seen in 2H21 what Verizon will do with the multitude of value brands, whether to shrink and focus or leave under the notion that each value segment is important.  My bet is consolidation as 10 brands on to of Verizon Prepaid, Visible and Yahoo Mobile is quite the stuffed portfolio.   

T-Mobile Sprint Deal Done – Integration

Now that the T-Mobile acquisition of Sprint has been blessed, when will integration start? As we all know it’s been a lengthy journey since the $26B deal’s announcement in April 2018.  In September 2018, T-Mobile announced Sunit Patel to head merger and integration efforts.

Flash forward to February 2020, while T-Mobile and Sprint could not work closely on integration efforts, they’ve had a long runway in planning. Here are the key integration areas in my view:

1.     Executives and employees:  Like in most mergers and acquisitions, people are the first to come to mind. It’s almost certain that the acquiring company will win out in the executive suites. Overlapping areas such as human resources, marketing, engineering, operations and retail are likely to have been gamed out already, with few refinements.   The big if is making good on the promise that the acquisition/merger will be job accretive.

2.     Physical headquarters: It’s no secret that T-Mobile has expanded and updated their Bellevue spaces while Sprint’s offices, including the Overland Park campus has contracted.  Similar to competitors AT&T and Verizon, key executives will be expected to relocate to the Bellevue power center.

3.     Suppliers: Mergers always take a toll on suppliers. That is if they sold to two, now they’ll sell to one.  Invariably, that is part of the synergies calculation – suppliers may see reduced revenue because the new company will have better buying scale (on top of Softbank and DT added to the equation). However, since Sprint was cost cutting, there could be some spending bumps down the line.

4.     Infrastructure: T-Mobile has always highlighted the faster than usual of MetroPCS.  That is the decommissioning of their CDMA, repurposing the spectrum and lowering overlapping operational costs.   Indeed, Sprint is still on CDMA and it’s a strategic imperative to move those users (direct subs & wholesale partners) off so they may take advantage of PCS and move the 800 to DISH. 

5.     Distribution: While Sprint has been contracting their distribution, T-Mobile made commitment to expanding its doors.  Where there is overlap (i.e., T-Mobile and Sprint retail within a block or two), those retail shops could be sold to DISH as they will need to have postpaid retail presence beyond its prepaid Boost locations.   

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess the new T-Mobile integration will hit the ground running this week as the plans have already been put in place.  I’d expect some of the areas I touched on above (e.g., headcount/org chart/exit packages) will be announced within a week or week and a half, if not sooner.  

2Q19 America Movil Prepaid - Still Bleeding but Moving Some KPIs

For eleven quarters now, America Movil USA has been losing subscribers.  For 2Q19, it was 164,0000.  To be sure that is a big number and with a half glass full view, it's better than the same quarter a year ago with 635,000 losses.  As usual, its Safelink brand brought the most headache with 95,000 followed by 42,000 at the other brands. Surprisingly, the positive Straight Talk growth engine lost 30,000. This speaks to the competitive environment within the prepaid segment.

Still, the company's subscriber base is still formidable with 21.4 million subscribers but T-Mobile with 21.3 million will likely surpass America Movil as the largest US prepaid provider next quarter or the following. For those who are keeping track, AT&T is less than 4 million behind T-Mobile. 

One can argue these new losses have shrunk relative to the massive numbers in 2017 and 2018. Yet to the company's credit, there some some positive key performance indicators (KPI), churn and ARPU.  Churn has moved from mid-4% to a decent 3.7% level this quarter. ARPU has risen to $26 now from $20 at EOY '15, $24 at EOY '17 and somewhat stable at $26 at EOY '18.  Overall quarterly revenue has wavered slightly above and below the $2B mark.  

Why It Matters

It's clear that the big, no huge, loss quarters are slowly going away but Safelink continues to be an albatross around the company's neck. Straight Talk growth to offset some loss isn't assured as prepaid competition continues to be a two horse race between T-Mobile and AT&T. Based on trends, America Movil USA will cede its position as the 2nd largest US prepaid player. 

The company may be allowing the shedding of customers to trade for ARPU and revenue lift by focusing on its flagship Straight Talk brand. Looking ahead as a '19 goal, crossing from negative to positive growth would be a momentous milestone. 

AT&T's Prepaid Growth Story

If one looks at the last couple of quarters of net add performance, the prepaid market seems to be flattening. Powerhouses Metro by T-Mobile and Cricket which had dominated with large net additions have dropped from their high go-go growth past days.  Prepaid competition has always been tough and will certainly continue.  The drama in the T-Mobile/Sprint deal where uncertainty and change has brought concern to the dealer networks and employee bases, AT&T is standing out as the stable ship.  

To appreciate the AT&T's prepaid growth story, it began with the Leap acquisition announced in July of '13 and closed in March of '14.  Between the acquisition announcement and the close, Leap's subscriber base shrunk from about 5 million to over 4.5 million.  With Leap, AT&T's prepaid base moved to about 10 million subscribers at the close.  The Leap brand, Cricket, though known was declining and had an impact on AT&T's results in 2014. However, with brand expansion beyond Leap's regional footprint and AT&T's national coverage, the new Cricket began its growth story.   Increasing the 'doors' or distribution was central in this effort. This included expanding its dealer network and big box retail.

From 2015 to 2018, the AT&T prepaid net add annual run tallied over a million subscribers, negating 2014's growing pains which included decommissioning the Leap CDMA network and subscriber device migration.  

As prepaid evolved, it's still attracting a price sensitive segment but low plan price and free/discounted phones are just but several buying considerations. Embedding value is now mirroring postpaid plans. For example, Metro by T-Mobile is including mobile hotspot capability, music, generous Google storage and even Amazon Prime in higher tier plans. For Cricket's part, because of AT&T's Mexican network assets and Canadian roaming agreements, unlimited plan users can roam without charge in those countries.     

Recently, I had the opportunity to chat with John Dwyer, President of AT&T Prepaid on the state of his business.  A couple of Cricket highlights came up namely in the area of customer satisfaction triggered by comments made on the 1Q19 earnings call.  Though these were selected for the best PR, Chairman Stephenson revealed some important data points: 1) churn was under 3% and 2) Cricket subscribers accounted for 10 of the 17 million base, and had more than doubled since the Leap acquisition close.

Low churn is a key indicator of customer satisfaction and John reinforced that notion with JD Power wins in purchasing experience and customer satisfaction. As the former head of customer experience, he said that Cricket's net promoter score (NPS) moved from a -7 to now 43. By the way, NPS ranges from -100 to 100.  The 10 million Cricket subs suggest that there are 7 million prepaid subs to be share between branded prepaid and prepaid IoT.             

Branded prepaid took a shellacking in 4Q18 negating most of Cricket's 240K net adds. Observers checking the AT&T branded plans would note a double data promotion on its $50 ($40 with autopay) that runs until the end of July that suspiciously counters a similar promotion at Verizon, which isn't a surprise as each company have been longtime postpaid rivals for the same demographic.  This should hold true for each's branded prepaid offerings.

Back to the growth story - the last two quarters are shockingly lower than the previous 14 quarters.  The question is has the growth engine stalled because of overall market trends? Indeed, competitors' previous quarter net addition numbers were comparably lower.  One possibility could be on the coat tails of the FirstNet buildout wherein AT&T claims a positive trajectory for postpaid growth.  While they cite promotional activity for FirstNet accounts to include families, FirstNet is also going to rural communities in which AT&T has planned on new distribution. While the focus is on postpaid growth, it's logical that prepaid distribution would also follow. It's unclear whether we'll see 300K+ net additions but at least there is a runway.  A caveat is that with T-Mobile's 600 MHz expansion, their rural coverage will also increase and prepaid could also follow in increasing distribution, if there is commitment from Seattle (the new power center) versus formerly the MetroPCS HQ of Dallas.  In the next year, we'll see how the AT&T prepaid growth engine performs, firing on all cylinders or sputtering.         

1Q19 America Movil USA Prepaid – Recovering and Shifting

America Movil with over 21.6 million subscribers is the largest US prepaid player in 1Q19, closely followed by T-Mobile (21.2M), AT&T (17.2M), Sprint ([CY 4Q18] 8.9M) and finally Verizon (4.48M). With many prepaid operating brands absorbed throughout the years and the backing of its Mexican-based parent, the company is still a prepaid force but has ceded prepaid leadership to AT&T and T-Mobile.   To put it in perspective, America Movil USA reached its corporate high of over 26 million subscribers in 4Q14.

Similar to Sprint, its bet on lifeline services (SafeLink) has punished its subscriber base count with continued losses.  Partially offsetting this downward pressure has been the shift from non-recurring plans, such as pay as you go, to higher ARPU bearing monthly plans.  Chiefly, Straight Talk (available at Walmart  and ~43% of its overall base) has been its growth engine for many quarters while the other brands have declined. To understand the significance of Straight Talk and SafeLink, the two are highlighted in quarterly earnings reports along with an Other Brands category (~44% of the base).  

For the quarter, there seems to be a recovery of sorts, relative to the big losses in 2017 and 1H18.  With only 89,000 net losses, the company contrasts that to 1Q18's 371,000 losses and 1Q17's 1.3 million. The focus on the higher-ARPU bearing Straight Talk with 175,000 additions has helped its ARPU rise for the quarter to $26, contrasting to 1Q18's $24, 1Q17's $23 and 1Q16's $21.  Another provided metric, churn is now at 3.7% where in previous quarters were north of 4%.

Why it Matters: From the above chart, the truly bad days seem to be behind the company but SafeLink will likely continue to contribute to the losses. Though losses are less for the quarter, the US business unit's EBITDA margins is a measly 6.2% compared to the high 20s to low 40s of other America Movil's business units. Also, rewinding four years, the US business unit's 1Q15's EBITDA margin was 11.7%.  This suggests that it's been a truly competitive prepaid environment and the biggest MVNO is just getting by. 

There have been suggestions that America Movil may be in a position to acquire a spun off Sprint prepaid unit as a possible condition of a T-Mobile/Sprint go-ahead. America Movil management has indicated receptiveness to that as buying companies to increase the US opportunity has always been in the playbook. By no means are they the default winner as there are other parties vying for a parted out Sprint prepaid unit, if the occasion arises. We'll know in June/July?

1Q19 Verizon Prepaid – Sustained Losses but It’s OK?

It’s almost like a broken record that the Verizon prepaid group continues to lose subscribers quarter after quarter. In fact,  the company has lost subscribers for the last six quarters. In tracking over 17 quarters, 14 have been losses.  

Here’s the breakdown for year ending:

2015 – 551,000

2016 – 133,000

2017 – 43,000

2018 – 757,000

These for years total over 1.48 million lost subscribers.  Add 1Q19’s 176,000 losses and the tally is over 1.6M. In late January, following the Verizon earnings call, I noted these continued losses and CFO Ellis then paid lip service to note that they’re going to evolve their offerings over time. For this quarter, CFO Ellis noted that the quarter’s losses were better than 1Q18’s -355,000, seemingly putting a "it's not that bad" spin on things.  The party line had always been allowing the shedding of low (profit) and price sensitive customers with the retention of high-value monthly plan subscribers who don’t mind paying premium for the Verizon brand/coverage.  That thought is also goes hand in hand with migrating the voice/text phone-only people off or help transition them to smartphone plans.

Why it still doesn’t matter: Verizon is first and foremost a postpaid company with marketing and retention dollars better served on the postpaid side. Prepaid is highly contested as two  players have dominated prepaid over last 3 years years, AT&T (Cricket) and T-Mobile (Metro by T-Mobile). The two have taken the lion’s share of the prepaid net additions and they will continue to do so as their distribution into non-urban areas expand.    At the end of 1Q19, Verizon’s retail base was close to crossing 118M.  The 4.48M prepaid count is just 3.8% overall. Then there’s the revenue.  If Verizon’s prepaid ARPU is in mid-high 30s and its postpaid ARPA in the $130s (no apples-to-apples, I know), one can see why prepaid just isn’t a huge priority.     

4Q18 AT&T Prepaid Momentum Stunted but Cricket is OK

After a monster run at huge net additions, the prepaid group somehow fell off a cliff. It's not a pretty sight, is it?  After its Leap Wireless acquisition, the company completed the acquisition in 1Q14, the company began to ramp up to expand the Cricket brand beyond the legacy region footprint.  T-Mobile's MetroPCS had a similar ramp in growth from 1Q15 to 1Q17.  By 2Q17, AT&T prepaid started taking the industry prepaid net add leader.  Therefore, AT&T 4Q18 prepaid numbers were a jaw dropper.

What happened:  Many industry watchers have become accustomed to Cricket as the net addition driving force.  However in the traditional cut-throat holiday selling quarter, promotions abounded.  Detailed in the earnings call Q&A, Chairman Randall Stephenson assured analysts that Cricket still had growth momentum with 240K net adds but the branded prepaid side suffered these losses. He pointed to two factors: 1) Branded prepaid subs were moving to competitors' postpaid and 2) AT&T did not want to counter a loss leading handset promotion (A $250 device was offered at $100).  As a result the prepaid phone net adds only amounted to 13K.  

Why it Matters:  While AT&T has been disciplined about not getting into promotions that hurt margin, it does impact the view that growth and competition is hurting them in the very visible net addition metric. It's likely that the AT&T branded prepaid loss could factor in the gains at T-Mobile, perhaps both pre and postpaid.  Unless the competition can sustain a loss leader strategy and Cricket growth stagnates, AT&T 1Q19 prepaid net additions should climb out of that cliff. Stephenson has noted glowingly in the past about Cricket's ARPU (~$35) being close to postpaid.  Prepaid has been a bright spot over the last two years of growth and revenue contribution, offsetting the declining and handcuffed postpaid side. With more of the same postpaid performance anticipated in '19, prepaid needs to get its mojo back.  

4Q18 Verizon Prepaid Continues Decline

Verizon prepaid has steadily lost subscribers over the many quarters. For 4Q18 the carrier lost 90,000 subscribers, 3K more than last quarter. This performance, on the surface, is disturbing for any student of business. In the 3Q18 earnings call, CFO Ellis stated, "..prepaid is certainly a small part of our business. And we will continue to evolve and adapt the product offering there over time."  The company was to focus the prepaid offerings on value-added segments. The 4Q18 results suggest it's either not working or still a work in process into 2019.

Why it doesn't matter: Verizon's retail subscriber base is now nearly 118 million subscribers of which the prepaid base is about 4.6 million. That's less than 4% of the overall retail subscribers.  Even though the prepaid group had been north of 5 million, the postpaid side is where the money is at.  In contrast, the postpaid subscriber net additions exceeded 1.2 million.  In the end for prepaid competition, Verizon as a brand, while strong force in postpaid is a non-contender in prepaid.    

Axios Type Posts Going Forward

When I spent time at my old company, Current Analysis, the value to the customer base on quick analysis was brevity and competitive impact. We wrote (at the time) very short but meaningful opinions and analyses on events (announcements, plan changes) on the competitive landscape.

Fast forward to 2019 and a news website has taken brevity to the extreme with similar goals but less words.  I'll try this format from now on....

   FTW

2017 Prepaid Roundup - Winners and Losers

Yes, it's true. 2017 is two months behind us and the wireless industry is talking about the up and coming 5G.  While the US carrier sector focuses on the higher revenue and lower churn bearing postpaid segment, prepaid is often overlooked. Though prepaid experiences lower average revenue per user and higher churn, prepaid revenue and subs are still a formidable wireless segment.

The big 5 prepaid players, some with flanker brands, dominate the net addition or loss numbers. Therefore, the focus will be on AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon and America Movil.

Losers

It's pretty obvious from the above chart which company is the year's biggest loser. America Movil lost over 2.9M subscribers. According to the company, the dominant contributor was Safelink (government subsidized lifeline program) disconnects. America Movil wasn't the only company that bet big on the government program. Sprint's Assurance Wireless brand targeted the same segment and also suffered previous losses in its prepaid base.

The second loser was Verizon prepaid. After what looked like an upward trend in 2Q and 3Q, the company crashed with 184K losses, mostly with prepaid basic phones. Verizon and America Movil are moving to increase revenue with smartphone subscribers, in essence deemphasizing the classic pay as you go customer.  These two companies are somewhat late to the party as that's been the strategy for T-Mobile's MetroPCS and AT&T's Cricket for several years.

Winners

The clear winner in terms of sub adds is clearly AT&T's Cricket.  This flanker brand has been the steady growth catalyst since 2015.  What's important for AT&T is the momentum shift from 2016 in which T-Mobile (MetroPCS) dominated with over 2.5M adds versus AT&T's ~1.6M. It's likely the two company rivalry will continue. Despite losing the overall 2017 growth title, T-Mobile is a winner. Last but not least is Sprint with its major brands Boost Mobile and Virgin Mobile. Though Sprint came out 373K subs in the positive and paled in comparison to AT&T and T-Mobile, one needs context.  In 2016, Sprint lost about 500K subs and in 2015 the loss number was over 1.5M.  So 2017 was a win for Sprint in my book  

2018  

Coming out of 2017, each player is focused on growing subscribers using the multi-line strategy. While the revenue per user part is less than a single line, the playbook is decidedly reminiscent of postpaid. Remember the old voice days when the financial community were shortsightedly concerned that carriers were leaving money on the table with meager $10/month add-a-lines?  The tradeoff obviously is in lower churn. More lines equals the less likelihood to churn.  The equation changes a bit with prepaid as price is also a main consideration.   At the end of '17 and also now, competitors are moving to the 4 lines for $100/month.   As this is tax 'refund' season (for some), competitors are throwing in the free phone promotion here or there.  But Cricket has somewhat escalated a price war with a $40/month unlimited single line price. The promo duration ends on April 12th. The fine print is that the plan price is only for one year.

Surprisingly, competitors haven't matched as the equivalent plan is still $50.  Historically, the sub activity has  usually occurred in the 1st and 3rd quarters.  It's hard to say whether each competitor will be the instigator for more plan action but there is a balance between acquiring more subscribers while showing higher ARPU/ARPA/ABPU trends and increasing margin AND decrease churn. It's a tall order.

Distribution will define further growth opportunities. MetroPCS can certainly ride the T-Mobile postpaid's coat tails as the company expands into the hinterlands with its 600 MHz spectrum.  Similarly, Cricket can expand its national brand footprint as it gains more dealers.  It's likely that AT&T and T-Mobile will dominate the prepaid scene as Verizon's focus has always been the more lucrative postpaid.  Sprint's tight corporate budget also suggests that its acquisition money should heavily favor postpaid to further its turnaround story (I'm still waiting for Virgin Mobile's 'game-changing' contribution.  Lastly, America Movil will likely continue to shed lifeline customers with incremental growth in the Walmart exclusive Straight Talk.  Let's see what happens.  

AT&T Prepaid - 4Q17, A Strong 2017

AT&T's reinvigorated prepaid group has been plugging away after the Leap Wireless (Cricket) acquisition and integration in 2014. Rather than keep the then AT&T Aio flanker brand, Cricket's name had better traction in the prepaid sector.  While AT&T is more than just the Cricket brand (remember GoPhone?), Cricket brings in the lion's share of the additions.

Overall, the Cricket unit has been a positive development, adding over 1.3 million (M) subs in 2015 and over 1.5M in 2016.  Its playbook mirrors its chief rival, MetroPCS which was acquired in 2012. The regionally limited MetroPCS brand expanded along with the T-Mobile national footprint, increasing the brand's distribution reach.  This has also been the case as Cricket increased its footprint and distribution.  With about a 1.5 to 2 year head start, MetroPCS has been the industry prepaid net add leader, with more than 1.3M in 2015 and over 2.3M in 2016.  Given this trajectory, one would expect them to lead in 2017.  However, for 2017, the overall prepaid net add leader is AT&T with just over 1M net adds to T-Mobile's 855 thousand.  



The overall trend, based on the leaders' numbers, is that prepaid isn't growing as hot as it was several years ago.  4Q17's numbers for both companies seem anemic in a Year over Year comparison.  Yet more confounding for industry watchers, AT&T has incorporated prepaid IoT (they say vehicle connectivity) into its 3 and 4Q17 numbers. Those account for 152 thousand additions. If we remove those numbers, AT&T still wins 2017 with 861 thousand, barely edging out T-Mobile's prepaid group.

Looking ahead to 2018, there are two things I'm looking for in the near term:

1. 1Q18 net add numbers: Generally, carriers' 1Q numbers have been the year's strongest. Will these numbers be 2016 or 2017 levels? As of this writing, Boost, Cricket and MetroPCS's lead offer are similar - 4 lines for $100. 
2. AT&T Prepaid IoT ramp:  AT&T has been building IoT connected vehicle business with auto manufacturers for several years now with the fruit of embedded connections for every vehicle. As new models and more manufacturers get online, the prepaid IoT numbers should increase. Churn and ARPU for this segment should be interesting if broken out (ideally).        

Talking About Sprint Since Marcelo Claure's On-Boarding

Dan Meyer from RCR Wireless and I discuss Sprint's CY1Q16 results but revisit where Sprint is since Marcelo Claure has taken over as CEO.  We look at his priorities when he took over in August 2014 in the areas of:

• The executive team - who is in, who left, how the company is organizing
• Network - CapEx
• Cost containment including leasing companies, layoffs and $2.5B savings target
• Stabilizing revenue, the postpaid subscriber base and being the Value carrier

In the back half of the video, we talk about Glenlivet 12.

4Q15 US Carrier Wrap Up - Some of what to Look at in '16 - Scotch

In early February,  Dan Meyer from RCR Wireless talk about what happened with results for 4Q15.  Who won in prepaid and postpaid and the details of the U.S. operators AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless.

We talk a bit about network, handset and price promotion trends and some things to look out for in 2016.  

At the end, we talk briefly with some toe in the water comments about single-malt scotch and hiding it from guests.

2015 Holiday Promos & 2016 US Carrier Outlook

Talking with Dan Meyer from RCR Wireless about holiday promotions and 2016 carrier outlook.

Bullet Point Analysis: Sprint's RadioShack Store Deal - A Lot of Positives

What is it?

RadioShack's bankruptcy allowed Sprint to partner with General Wireless Inc., a subsidiary of Standard General LP, RadioShack’s largest shareholder (a hedge fund), to increase Sprint branded retail distribution by approximately 1,750 stores, more than doubling Sprint's current 1,100 company store count. The transaction is subject to approval by the bankruptcy court.

The plan at that point will be to establish co-branded (Sprint and RadioShack) stores where Sprint and RadioShack would sell their separate services. 

Analysis

Although it didn't make company's FY3Q14 earnings call deck, it's better late than never.  

The deal has many wins for Sprint since:

• Above all, the company expands their distribution base to help with gross additions (postpaid and prepaid brands) and get potential subscribers in the door interested in the much campaigned "Cut Your Bill in Half Event" that will continue into 2015.

• Distribution count will exceed surging rival T-Mobile. In the FY3Q14 earnings call, CEO Claure stated that Sprint was 500-600 less than T-Mobile. With the new stores, gets T-Mobile's count in one swoop, bringing the total Sprint count to over 2,800 retail points of distribution.  

• Those 1,750 stores have been cherry picked.  Logically, these new stores would not cannibalize existing Sprint retail traffic, and serve the right Sprint target demographic - Verizon and AT&T prime customers.

• The stores will be co-branded but Sprint is the primary brand. Sprint and RadioShack says that each brand's customers may be cross-marketed to but the ability to share lease space costs should not be overlooked. Sprint will only occupy a third of the store space so relative to operating a full store, Sprint in theory has lower costs.

• With all the negativity of a declining brand and controlling costs, headcount cuts have been an unfortunate tool. However, Sprint will need employees to operate these stores. RadioShack employees who are already trained at selling mobile devices and plans are logical candidates. In theory, it's an easy transition as reps will only need to focus on Sprint plans versus the many prepaid MVNO options and those of Verizon and AT&T. In fact, because of the breadth of knowledge, these reps will know what competitors' plan weak points may be. 

Yet there are questions. 

• Like many deals, the financial and commitment terms were not divulged so it's undetermined how good of a long term financial deal this is.  

• The deal needs the blessing of the bankruptcy court and if that is given in short order, this doesn't mean that Sprint can move in immediately.  The store rep human resources process will need to be address, planning the look and buildout of a third of every store will need to be done.  Given this, the impact of the 2015 gross additions look to be in the back half of the year.

• This last point can be both a positive and negative.   By taking over these 1,750 stores, Sprint takes out the same number of distribution points for postpaid rivals AT&T and Verizon (no T-Mobile) and Tracfone prepaid brands (US Cellular in some markets).  The big "BUT" is the amount of wireless business a declining RadioShack generated for competitors. If it's immaterial, then it's not that great of a loss for those competitors.

Overall, this deal is one of the best moves Sprint has jumped on since the beginning of CEO  Claure's tenure. 

What 2015 Brings

Originally posted on Fiercewireless just before the Christmas holiday.

2014 is nearly at and end and it's the time of the year when there are countless year-end review articles and 2015 predictions. While there were many highlights of 2014, I choose to hone in on network and competition.  Instead of predictions, my 2015 expectations have been laid out with technology paths and the previous year's events.

Network 

Every carrier knows that beyond service plan value and pricing, the network is the core of customer choice. It's no surprise that despite goals the carriers reach, improving, expanding and transforming the network will never really be done. Although AT&T Mobility and Verizon Wireless have reached their coverage targets, capital is still being expended to bolster networks for capacity and coverage. T-Mobile US and Sprint continue their breakneck pace to reach LTE network parity with larger competitors.   

AT&T met its 300 million POP coverage target in early September, surpassing its original end of the year target as it needed to close the gap against its main rival, Verizon. AT&T also needed to keep pace in its Voice over LTE introduction, albeit available in only in select markets. Aside from adding coverage, capacity, and expanding VoLTE in 2015, the company continues its ambitious transformation into a software-centric network by 2020.  Two big acquisitions, slated to be complete by the first half of 2015 will trigger network related work.  First, the DirecTV acquisition, the company will need to fulfill its promise to provide fixed wireless broadband to rural markets. With the acquisition of Mexican carrier Iusacell expected to close in the first quarter of next year, much of the remaining year should be laying a foundation for what AT&T touts to be the first North American mobile service area.

Sprint's 2014 travails from the "rip and replace" Network Vision program and turbulent corporate changes contributed to massive uncertainty and subscriber losses. Although the company ended the year with 260 million LTE POPs covered on its PCS spectrum, roaming deals with rural carriers is set to expand its own LTE geographic reach to 298 million POPs in 2015. Ironically, as competitors over delivered on coverage and timing, Sprint met its end of year 100 million 2.5GHz LTE POP target, despite skepticism. In August, the 2.5 GHz buildout strategy shifted to address the heavy data consumption markets, with the logic that the popular unlimited proposition is empty without a high capacity foundation. Still, Sprint hasn't disclosed any POP targets for 2015, as it has previously.   

T-Mobile over delivered and beat its own 2014 250 million POP target with 260 million covered LTE POPs. For 2014, the network story was one of aggressive execution by acquiring and deploying 700 MHz A-Block spectrum and refarming/implementing MetroPCS' spectrum to exceed its target. The company is very public about reaching an end of 2015 300 million POP target (without roaming) to close the network perception gap against larger competitors. In doing so, it will continue work to put in service remaining 700, AWS and PCS spectrum.  At the same time, to get better low-band breadth, it will opportunistically purchase additional 700 MHz spectrum. However, since some regional and rural carriers will implement the same A-Block flavor, LTE roaming agreements are logical.

Though Verizon Wireless technically met the 30 million POPs covered threshold in mid-2013, the company continued to deploy and put into service AWS spectrum for capacity and fill-in. Since reaching the 300 million mark, it added 8 million more by the end of 2014. Though it has already started refarming its PCS spectrum for LTE on a limited scale, this effort will likely continue as planned in 2015.

Technologies of Common Interest

• Carrier Aggregation: This LTE Advanced feature provides the capability to extend coverage, capacity and speed. AT&T has already started using the carrier aggregation feature mainly with its 700 and AWS assets. While AT&T does not have a national AWS footprint, it's logical that PCS spectrum that it is refarming would also be put into play.  As part of its 2014 2.5 GHz buildout, Sprint stated that it was rolling out two-carrier aggregation but eventually add another carrier (end of 2015) for three-carrier aggregation to raise the speed game.  T-Mobile has not said when it will deploy carrier aggregation, but it will be planned for the coming years to piece together its 700 and AWS and PCS assets.  Verizon Wireless will enable carrier aggregation to its national 700 (Band 13) and AWS footprint.   Given early PCS refarming and LTE deployment, there could be the technical possibility of 700 and PCS aggregation where appropriate.
  
  One likely byproduct of all this work will be increased speed, possibly allowing one carrier to best another nationally or in specific markets. Regardless, RootMetrics is the biggest beneficiary, as every carrier have used reliability and speed claims for public relations from their reports. Behind the scenes, it's certain that carrier in-house test organizations, third party specialists Nielsen Mobile and GWS will be busy verifying.

• VoLTE: AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless all have implemented VoLTE. Only AT&T has not claimed nationwide capability but that hasn't stopped inter-carrier interoperability activity planned for 2015. Though T-Mobile was snubbed from the press release, it would be logical that they plug in eventually.  Sprint's CDMA-based HD Voice implementation and introduction leaves them out of the VoLTE club temporarily but it has a more important focus: expanding 800 MHz and 2.5 GHz LTE. 

• LTE Broadcast: Only AT&T and Verizon have committed to this technology and have high hopes to monetize their investment.  Business models will be tested for sure.

• Wi-Fi calling: While T-Mobile used an entire "uncarrier" number (7.0) on Wi-Fi calling, helped with iPhone, it's a low priority for the big two rivals. Still Verizon Wireless and AT&T expect to deliver this capability as it likely helps business and vacationers traveling abroad.

Competition

2014 was remarkable in the level of competition. Since space is short, we'll just focus on postpaid and prepaid. On the postpaid side, there were nearly 80 pricing actions and promotions from the top four carriers, not counting the numerous extensions of promotional offers. This was more than double that of 2013. Several standout service plan tools drove customer action; these included Early Termination Fee (ETF) credit, tablet data for life, double data promotions, and no money down equipment installation plans.  

Carriers departed from the past practice of constantly restructuring their rate plans, gaming the right price point with the right data level. Though AT&T and Verizon changed their plans in the beginning of the year (i.e., Mobile Share to Mobile Share Value and Share Everything to More Everything) and Sprint rebooted in August with its Family Share Pack and iPhone for Life, limited time promotions in the back half of 2014 drove postpaid volatility and grabbed all the media headlines. Promotions gave carriers a temporary lever to address competition without permanent price drops or higher data levels.

Entering the fourth quarter, this visual graph showed the postpaid net add trending in the previous three quarters, showing T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless with good postpaid net add energy.

Source: Carrier Reports

However, carriers' full 2014 results won't be known until late January or early February when fourth-quarter earnings calls are conducted.  What we do know has been telegraphed: due to intense competition, Verizon and AT&T warned that churn was a concern. T-Mobile increase its 2014 total net add guidance from 2.8-3.3 million to 4.3-4.7 million and Sprint was confident that they would deliver positive fourth-quarter postpaid net adds. 

Without full 2014 data, can we expect the same intensity of postpaid competition in 2015? It's obvious that competition will never cease in the wireless sector but there are some road signs that it won't lull.

• Sprint's need to grow: Sprint lost nearly 600,000 customers by Q3. They cannot stop the march to win back customers.  Going after AT&T's and Verizon's large postpaid bases will likely continue, but how aggressive will the campaign be – sustained intensity in each quarter or pick and choose?
• T-Mobile and Sprint will continue to employ a $350 ETF switching credit. For T-Mobile, it's an "uncarrier 4.0" tenet while Sprint will need it as a necessary tool to prevent T-Mobile getting all the switching spoils.
• AT&T and Verizon won't sit back and play defense. 2014 showed that the big two hit back with their own switching and double data promotions. However, they won't be instigators.

Yet the intensity may be tempered as there were signs of financial community/investor skittishness that dropped stock prices. Industry competition is great for consumers but the wireless sector's volatility impacts decreasing margins and perceived overpaying for future spectrum.  2014 will likely be a blowout year for T-Mobile but replicating that performance has already been downplayed at various recent investor conferences. Rather, the thrust was about stabilizing ARPU, retention and upselling. Still, T-Mobile won't stop given their momentum.   

Prepaid never sees the headlines that postpaid commands. Though growth wasn't what it was in previous years, it's still hotly contested and relevant.  In prepaid, there were about 70 price and promotion actions, not counting any extensions. This was up a hair from 2013. The prepaid graph illustrates TracFone (folded in acquisitions) and T-Mobile being the big winners up to Q3.

Source: Carrier Reports

Unlike the postpaid activity predominantly occurring in the first three months and the last four months of the year, prepaid promotions and actions were evenly spread across the year. The battles for high-value monthly users consistently apply among the various TracFone brands, AT&T's Cricket, T-Mobile's MetroPCS and Sprint's Boost and Virgin Mobile brands.  While price sensitivity has always been a prepaid hallmark, a shift in network and LTE marketing is broadening.  Meanwhile, legacy CDMA user migration is still on the plate for Cricket and MetroPCS as each seek to move those customers onto the parent's LTE networks. 

2015 competition should be spirited, as Cricket and MetroPCS will continue their head-to-head fight. Boost and Virgin will try to stay relevant in the fight while. Given postpaid's momentum, prepaid growth may be stymied at similar 2014 rates. Get the popcorn ready for next year.

Video: Takeaways From 3Q14 Tier One Carrier Earnings

It's beginning to be like a regular thing - Dan Meyer from RCR Wireless and I talk about what we've learned from everyone's earnings reports.  No doubt there were tons of noteworthy details missed but we had 30 minutes....

RCR Article  - Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile US, Sprint: what did we learn?

Straight to the video

Video: Key Points in Q2 2014 Tier 1 Carrier Results

Once again, I get together with Dan Meyer, Editor-in-Chief of RCR Wireless to talk about Q2 2014 carrier performance and key take aways from their earnings calls.

Bullet Point Analysis: Boost Mobile Moves Defensive - The Battleground 40, 50, 60 Price Points

WHAT IS IT?

On May 6, Boost Mobile replaced its old monthly plan portfolio with a new Unlimited Select plans at three price points and specific data thresholds.

ANALYSIS

The prepaid sector is often characterized by high churn profiles and low credit scores. However, it is also a sector with high revenue and subscriber growth potential, courting feature phone upgraders (either prepaid customers or postpaid users looking for better deals in prepaid).  Sprint has made big bets on prepaid as a corporate growth engine. Prepaid subs represents 28% of the overall Sprint customer base.  Various sub brands (Assurance, Boost Mobile, Virgin Mobile) address specific prepaid demographics.  Yet 1Q14 was a bad quarter for prepaid with 465K losses, most of it blamed on Assurance brand losses. Boost's unlimited plans (along with Virgin Mobile's Beyond Talk plans) that garner higher monthly ARPU is clearly an important revenue component to Sprint's prepaid strategy and needs to be protected.  

Now with Boost's new plans at $40, $50 and $60, these numbers are the magic competitive price points to wage the prepaid war in mid to late 2014.  Boost Mobile is merely catching up defensively to rivals that already presented those price points and sometimes the same data thresholds.  

• AT&T's flanker brands Aio/Cricket is in integration mode but Aio's price points and data thresholds match directly with the new Boost plans.  AT&T has been very vocal about being aggressive in attaining growth at the 'low end' using Cricket and will be a threat Boost.   Tactically, it's likely that the unified Cricket portfolio will come out with the added lower $40 price point (Currently $50-$70).  Moreover, AT&T's mid-April GoPhone plan action added a $40/500 MB plan to match T-Mobile's $40 Simple Starter launched earlier 10 days earlier.

• T-Mobile's MetroPCS plan portfolio already has the same price points and always has been a strong competitor to Boost. By T-Mobile's 1Q14 prepaid earnings metrics, MetroPCS is doing well and though T-Mobile doesn't break out its contribution, the company added 465K prepaid users.  T-Mobile's internal code word in launching new markets is Apollo. The company is up to 30 new markets and continuing.  This Metro expansion has not only eaten into Cricket marketshare, it certainly has impacted Boost.    

COMPETITIVE IMPACT?

Every competitor has its own differentiation despite the same price points. The challenge is to communicate this to the target audience and cut through the usual selection criteria of device and plan pricing.

• AT&T's GoPhone portfolio has the advantage of built-in international calling and messaging while rivals MetroPCS and Boost need international package add-ons.  
• The new Cricket has high hopes and promise for its parent. Its primary focus is to recapture lost ground from MetroPCS and Boost will be impacted in the mix. It's uncertain if Muve music, which was an apparent differentiator, will continue to be promoted.  UPDATE: Muve Music is said to be on the auction block. Certainly, at a minimum, the expanded underlying AT&T LTE footprint and perhaps speed will be touted.
• MetroPCS continues to expand in an effort to migrate its legacy CDMA users (featurephone) to new LTE handsets on top of expanding its distribution to grab marketshare in new markets.  Boost's plans again are catching up to MetroPCS.

Boost Mobile needed to make its latest portfolio change to keep up with its main competitors.  There aren't any features in the new Unlimited Select plans that stand out against competitors. Boost Shrinkage discount approach is unique but how well does that retain a fickle customer segment?  Cricket and AT&T plans stand out as unlimited international texting (and limited international calling for GoPhone) are baked in.  Metro and Boost need to figure out if these features are competitively substantial in winning prepaid monthly adds.   
     

Bullet Point Analysis: AT&T GoPhone Adjustments, Defensive & Offensive

WHAT IS IT?

On April 18, AT&T announced two smartphone GoPhone prepaid plan adjustments and introduced a Wal-Mart specific plan:

• The $60 plan increased data from 2 to 2.5 GB + enabled Wi-Fi hotspot capability + unlimited talk 

• The $40 plan increased data from 200 to 500MB + 500 minutes of talk 

• Available at Wal-Mart stores nationwide, a new plan with 1GB of data for $45 a month + unlimited talk

Existing $40/$60 plan customers will automatically receive these increase data levels.  Moreover, not announced, the smartphone $50 unlimited calling and texting plan with WiFi-only (no data allotment) is no longer available. Though the plans are supposed to kick off on April 25, the changes are already available online.

ANALYSIS

The plan action with three components are a mix of defensive and offensive moves.  Anytime a company makes a change, there are clearly causes and effects.  

• As I wrote in my previous post on T-Mobile's newly launched $40 Simple Starter, that plan threatened prepaid competitors.  Eight days later, AT&T shored up its entry $40 GoPhone plan seemingly in a defensive move to match Simple Starter data threshold of 500 MB.  On the surface, it's merely a match but AT&T provides a differentiation for a specific segment of prepaid audience, those who text internationally. Still, Simple Starter addresses the needs of the talker as the plan offers unlimited calling; AT&T only provides 500 anytime minutes.  Against Verizon's $45 ALLSET, $40 price point comes out ahead for the price sensitive though Verizon's add-on data options offer better value. 

While the $40's nemesis was T-Mobile, the $60 GoPhone plan goes up against the Sprint's prepaid SmartPlus unlimited plan at the same price point with the same 2.5 GB threshold (throttled to 3G afterwards).  Sprint's other prepaid brands Boost and Virgin Mobile match other competitors such as MetroPCS and Cricket best.

• Finally, the tell tale sign of an offensive against Tracfone's Straight Talk is a Wal-Mart only plan. The $45/1GB plan matches the price point exactly though StraightTalk is unlimited and throttled after 2.5GB. The AT&T brand, WiFi hotspot tethering, as well as LTE access could be a differentiation but traditional value Wal-Mart shoppers may simplistically look at more data.  

• The ace in the hole for GoPhone is international messaging that competitors do not offer for the respective price points. This will appeal stronger to a specific subscriber demographic.  Provided that AT&T heavily markets this either in niche advertising or social channels, it may be lost.

AT&T's prepaid moves should be construed as urgent since it has lost prepaid subs for the last two quarters ( -32K 4Q2013 & -50K 1Q14).  Though the year-over-year view (-166 4Q12 & -184K 1Q13) looks better, the long and short of it is AT&T lost subs. By contrast, Verizon Wireless has had positive prepaid growth for the last eight quarters, decent for a primarily postpaid company whose prepaid subs are less than 6% of the retail/branded customer base.

COMPETITIVE IMPACT?

• AT&T's GoPhone move is just one component of a reversing prepaid strategy which mainly hangs it hat on the new Cricket market expansion. T-Mobile's MetroPCS brand had been targeting AT&T and Cricket heavily with the 'Apollo' market launches.  In the 1Q14 earnings call, AT&T said that the new Cricket will re-launch at the end of 2Q14, likely targeting T-Mobile and MetroPCS trying to reacquire lost subs. T-Mobile's entry plan featurephone switching growth may be blunt if AT&T markets heavily against that segment.

• Sprint overall needs to consider international messaging for postpaid and SmartPlus given this AT&T action. It may be too early to see how Sprint branded prepaid performs since Sprint doesn't specifically break out brand performance. 

• Verizon's ALLSET plan's $45 price point doesn't match well but it may be unlikely that a plan change is unnecessary unless AT&T makes inroads for a couple of quarters and attains notable marketshare.